Mr Spin sister sites

Former Mr Spin sister sites compared

Written by Benjamin Rose – Head Writer

Mr Spin shared its operator and in-house games with the brands below. The differences lay in presentation, game categories and promotions. These comparisons describe the former In Touch family; a later licence held by another operator is a separate part of a brand’s history.

Casino 2020

Casino 2020 made its year-based name the centre of its identity. Its light blue and white presentation was a quieter alternative to Mr Spin’s dark background and orange accents. The year in the name made the intended launch-era identity immediately apparent, even after that year had passed.

Its illustrated historical review shows a small featured-game row, a jackpot panel and referral promotion. Mr Spin gave its loyalty shop more obvious space in the main navigation. That is a useful distinction between the two products: Casino 2020 foregrounded a fresh casino identity, while Mr Spin offered a recognisable rewards destination alongside its games. Both depended on the same company’s catalogue. See the Casino 2020 review for its original screen and launch-date context.

Bonus Boss

Bonus Boss had a stronger character theme than Mr Spin. Its fictional gangsters appeared in the main banner and in The Spinfather, so the artwork and the featured slot reinforced one another. Mr Spin’s top hat and circular arrow supplied a compact identity without creating such an elaborate cast.

That made Bonus Boss the more theatrical comparison, but visual personality did not make its bonus terms automatically better. Its welcome spins were attached to a named game and carried conditions. The two sites also pursued different promotional identities: Mr Spin’s loyalty shop offered a catalogue of rewards, whereas Bonus Boss used featured games and tokens. The historical Bonus Boss review explains The Spinfather and the difference between its slot features and standalone casino games.

Pocket Win

Pocket Win came from the earlier generation of casinos designed around phones. In Touch’s February 2023 company profile places its launch in 2010 and describes slots, bingo, roulette and blackjack. Its name expressed the mobile idea directly, while Mr Spin used a more conventional casino character.

Mobile design was part of Pocket Win’s purpose from its early years. Mr Spin followed a similar approach, with a compact menu and its own mixture of slots and bingo. Pocket Win subsequently appeared under Viral Interactive; that later period should not be assigned to Mr Spin or confused with their earlier In Touch relationship. The Pocket Win page separates those periods.

mFortune

mFortune was the oldest main casino in the company profile, dating to 2007. Its combination of bingo and slots established the pattern that later In Touch brands developed. For Mr Spin, the particularly useful comparison was its rewards shop: both sites extended promotions beyond a single welcome bonus into a catalogue of items or credits.

The rewards shop made mFortune a particularly relevant comparison for anyone interested in Mr Spin’s promotional design. The attraction was the type of reward, while its value depended on points, eligibility and redemption rules. Mr Spin was therefore a close product relative, even though its branding was different. Like Pocket Win, mFortune had a later Viral Interactive period. The mFortune history should be read with that operator change in mind.

Dr Slot

Dr Slot concentrated on slots more narrowly than Mr Spin. Its name made that focus explicit, and the lack of a broad bingo or table-game proposition was part of the product’s identity. Mr Spin’s bingo tab and loyalty-shop navigation gave it more than one reason for a visitor to look beyond the opening slot banner.

Dr Slot also has a specific award record: WhichBingo lists its 2019 Best New Slots Site award. That is a historical distinction, not a reason to treat a closed casino as a current recommendation. Nor does the award establish that every later version of its catalogue was superior. The comparison is most useful as a contrast between a slots specialist and Mr Spin’s broader combination of games and rewards.

Jammy Monkey

Jammy Monkey’s sparse presentation offered less visual character than the stronger In Touch themes. Its restrained identity left the games and promotions to supply most of the interest. Mr Spin’s prominent loyalty shop gave its relatively restrained design a clearer additional feature.

Jammy Monkey nevertheless had its own promotional identity, including game-of-the-month offers and Jammy Rewards in historical descriptions. Those features gave it a reason for customers to return even without the appliance-led rewards that distinguished Mr Spin. Its later appearance under Viral Interactive also belongs to a different operating period. The Jammy Monkey history is therefore useful both for comparing a minimalist product with Mr Spin and for understanding why an old family list cannot stand in for later licence records.

Cashmo

Cashmo was another close visual and mobile comparison. Its compact branding and focus on the casino product were nearer to Mr Spin than Bonus Boss’s character-filled scene. The company profile describes Cashmo as In Touch’s first browser-based casino, which is a more precise distinction than saying it could only be used on a phone.

Cashmo can be seen as a later development of the phone-oriented Pocket Win approach. Its browser emphasis made that design available without defining the product solely by an installed phone app. Mr Spin’s loyalty shop remains the sharper point of difference. The Cashmo review provides the separate brand history; neither a resemblance in design nor a shared payment method establishes a continuing service.

Slot Factory

Slot Factory was both a games label associated with the in-house catalogue and a former consumer domain named in the Commission’s closure notice. Including that consumer brand gives Mr Spin eight former sisters. Company profiles often concentrate on eight main casinos in total, producing seven other names when Mr Spin itself is excluded.

The supplier and consumer roles should remain distinct. A Slot Factory game appearing at another casino does not make that casino a Mr Spin sister site. Equally, a game continuing under Skywind does not revive the closed Mr Spin account system or its loyalty shop. The In Touch Games operator history brings the former brands together.

Mr Spin information

Mr Spin operator and licence history

In Touch Games combined consumer casinos with in-house development. That explains the recurring games across its brands and the company’s ability to build a casino identity around them. A parent company, the licensed operator and the game-development label nevertheless have different roles.

Skywind’s acquisition

Skywind’s acquisition announcement is dated 7 June 2022. It said the purchase of Intouch Games Group was complete and described an opportunity to introduce Skywind content to the acquired customer base. It did not say that every game or casino had already moved to a new platform.

That ownership change did not replace In Touch Games as the operator identified in the subsequent regulatory announcements.

Enforcement and closure

The March 2021 regulatory announcement imposed a £3.4 million fine, warning and audit requirement for social-responsibility, anti-money-laundering and marketing failures. It included failures in customer interaction and omissions from the significant terms in promotional text messages.

In January 2023, the Commission announced a further £6.1 million penalty after another assessment. It cited delayed customer interaction and failures to implement source-of-funds policies, and also referred back to a £2.2 million settlement in 2019.

The Commission then suspended the operating licences on 1 September 2023. Its updated suspension notice states that In Touch surrendered its licence on 5 September and was expected to arrange an orderly closure for British consumers. The notice expressly named mrspin.co.uk among the affected websites.

The historical register recorded an end date of 4 September, while the announcement reported the surrender on 5 September. These are two records of the end of the former permission, not evidence of a continuing service. The surviving announcement is also the clearest source for the operator’s responsibility to explain access to customer funds during closure.

Historical Mr Spin review

Mr Spin’s most distinctive feature was its loyalty shop. The casino offered a modest in-house game catalogue, but the possibility of exchanging points for physical goods gave it an identity beyond another welcome-spins promotion. Its dark blue presentation, orange controls and top-hat logo were practical rather than elaborate.

The archived Mr Spin website capture includes the yellow licence-surrender notice, a Bolts of Zeus game-of-the-month banner and the Loyalty Shop menu. The cookie panel is part of the original capture; the image does not show an operating service.

What the archived interface shows

The main menu put Banking, Bonuses and Promotions, Loyalty Shop and My Account across the top. Below the banner, separate Slots and Bingo tabs identified two different parts of the product. Orange highlights stood out against the dark background, while the games sat in a lighter panel underneath.

That arrangement gave the rewards shop equal visibility with routine account functions. A visitor did not have to infer that a loyalty scheme existed from a small footer link. The large monthly-game banner also shows how the casino could promote a new title without presenting an enormous catalogue on its opening screen.

The capture has limits: its cookie notice obscures part of the first game row, and the yellow closure message is the most consequential text on it. Neither the remaining Join button nor a prominent promotion contradicted that message. Those elements record the former interface, while the notice explains why the service could no longer be used.

The loyalty shop and its physical prizes

The historical SlotCatalog review describes points earned through play and exchanged for bonus credit, headphones, washing machines and freezers. The rewards were therefore not limited to more spins. Household goods gave the shop a tangible character.

Bojoko’s account of the former product also lists electronics, experience days and vouchers. Those categories explain why the shop was more memorable than a conventional list of recurring deposit matches. A customer could compare a smaller credit reward with saving points towards a physical item.

That did not make the goods free in an economic sense. Points were associated with gambling activity, and the cost of that activity could exceed the value of a reward. The catalogue alone also could not establish delivery times, stock availability or the value of every point. Specific appliance prices in points are therefore less useful without the complete rules that applied to that version of the shop.

The shop was a strong product distinction, but it should not be confused with a cash balance or a guaranteed return from playing. Nor does the historical existence of a freezer or voucher in the catalogue establish that an outstanding redemption can be completed now.

Welcome spins and the deposit match

Historical descriptions agree on two headline elements: up to fifty registration spins and a first-deposit match of up to 100%, capped at £100. These were promotional credits with conditions, not unrestricted cash. The distinction between receiving spins and withdrawing any resulting winnings was essential to understanding the offer.

Bojoko’s preserved terms list 40-times wagering, a seven-day expiry and a £50 withdrawal cap on bonuses obtained without a deposit across the named In Touch accounts. SlotCatalog instead records 20-times wagering for the deposit match. Those descriptions cannot be combined into one definitive set of terms, and neither establishes an available offer today.

The archived screen itself includes 40-times wagering and a £50 cap for specified no-deposit promotional credit or spins. That supports the existence of significant restrictions, while leaving individual offers and their exact periods distinct. The older claim that the spins simply carried a ten-times requirement is not a dependable summary of all versions.

Monthly games and other promotions

Bolts of Zeus occupies the game-of-the-month banner in the archived image. The placement makes the promotional strategy visible: one title could become the focus of the page, with its own artwork and an accompanying offer. This complemented the loyalty shop, which gave returning customers a longer-running destination.

Historical accounts also described referral and occasional social promotions. Their importance was secondary to the shop and featured-game system. A changing offer did not become a permanent benefit just because it appeared in a review, and a promotional wheel should not be assumed to have survived every redesign. The useful history is the combination of rewards and featured titles, rather than a single timeless bonus list.

Bushtucker Bonanza

Bushtucker Bonanza brought a jungle-trial theme to the former catalogue. The title and insect imagery invite comparison with television challenge shows, but that resemblance does not establish an official programme licence. It was still a reel-based slot rather than an interactive television game.

PartyCasino’s game description identifies five reels and fifteen lines, with insects among the symbols and stars collected during free spins. Those stars built progress towards multiplier milestones. This gives the game a more specific identity than simply calling it unusual or entertaining.

Bushtucker Bonanza and Bushtucker Prizes are separate titles. Descriptions that interchange their names can also mix their features, so the Bonanza example here is limited to the clearly identified reel layout and star-collection bonus.

Fishin’ for Wins

Skywind’s Fishin’ for Wins page describes a five-by-three layout with twenty fixed lines. Fish, wilds and fisherman symbols are associated with its bonus features, and a Gold Fish feature can appear during free spins. Its fishing theme therefore has a concrete role in the game, rather than serving only as scenery.

Its fishing subject invites comparison with Big Bass Bonanza, although the two titles should be judged by their own rules. This example refers to the original Fishin’ for Wins, rather than automatically importing the rules of a later Megaways version.

Wild Wolf Moon and the wider catalogue

Wild Wolf Moon provided the wildlife-themed counterpart to the fishing and jungle examples. The historical Roger description links the title to Mr Spin. Its wolf imagery placed it in a familiar wildlife-slot tradition, giving the catalogue another easily recognised subject alongside fishing and jungle trials.

The three examples show the range within an in-house catalogue: jungle trials, fishing prizes and wolves. They do not demonstrate the breadth of a casino collecting games from many outside suppliers. Bingo and roulette added different formats, but there is no basis for describing Mr Spin as a full live-dealer or comprehensive card-game casino.

Payments, withdrawal timing and support

The former payment descriptions included debit cards, PayPal, prepaid cards and phone billing. Apple Pay also appeared in historical deposit lists. These routes were not interchangeable: a phone-bill deposit did not establish a matching route for receiving winnings, and a payment processor’s name was not itself a separate customer wallet.

SlotCatalog’s historical account distinguished the review of a withdrawal request from the later arrival of money, describing a one-business-day review and several possible business days for payment. That is more precise than promising that every customer received funds within a day. Verification could intervene, and the customer reports below include much longer delays.

Live chat and email were advertised support routes, and telephone assistance also appears in dated company records. In a July 2020 company reply, Mr Spin gave a telephone contact and described round-the-clock assistance. This establishes a historical support option, not a working service or response-time guarantee now.

Assessment of the former product

The loyalty shop was Mr Spin’s strongest distinguishing idea. It gave a restrained-looking casino something more memorable than its colour scheme, and the menu made that feature easy to identify. The named games also show that an in-house catalogue could contain different themes and bonus mechanisms.

The limitations were equally specific. The game range was narrower than a multi-provider casino, the welcome headlines concealed important conditions, and public complaints repeatedly concerned payment and communication. The rewards shop added character to the product, but it did not remove those practical limitations. The casino is now closed.

Customer accounts from the operating period

The dated Trustpilot record contains complaints about verification and withdrawals. A reviewer’s March 2023 update described difficulty obtaining money despite providing documents. Mr Spin’s April reply said additional identity, address or bank information could be needed. These are the two parties’ accounts, not an independently resolved case finding.

There were also reported outcomes. In an October 2022 exchange, Lawrence said his money had arrived after a dispute. The company acknowledged receipt and apologised for the delay. That preserves both the criticism and the eventual payment, without treating one outcome as typical of every account.

Other comments alleged unfair games after losses. In April 2023 the company replied that its games were independently audited. That response records the operator’s position; it is not a published audit report or proof that an individual allegation was investigated. Neither a losing session nor an unexamined company assurance establishes the underlying game’s fairness. The former licence and its regulatory history are addressed separately above.

Mr Spin FAQ

Is Mr Spin still open in Britain?

The former In Touch service closed after the September 2023 licence surrender. The Commission’s notice expressly names mrspin.co.uk.

Who operated Mr Spin?

In Touch Games Limited operated the casino under former Gambling Commission account 2091. Skywind announced its acquisition of the group in June 2022.

How many former sister brands did Mr Spin have?

Eight including Slot Factory, or seven other main casinos in company profiles that concentrated on the eight principal casino brands. Duplicate domains do not add extra brands.

What made the Mr Spin loyalty shop distinctive?

Its historical rewards included bonus credit and physical goods such as headphones, washing machines and freezers. Points and rewards were subject to the former scheme’s rules.

Are the old welcome spins and withdrawal estimates still valid?

No. They describe a closed service. Historical sources also record different terms, and a withdrawal review estimate was not a guarantee of when money would arrive.